This should still not be possible. Weather it works or not.
And u unfortunately just can’t know.
There’s no documentation on this even remotely being a thing.
So without testing yourself and examining the logs ur feelings on the matter just don’t matter.
I’m deploying for solo. And when I’m back up to max. I’ll provide more details. I’ll show any part
Please tell me where to look. Please prove me wrong.
The video is quite clear.
I agree with part of what you say, the GUI/CLI should yell at you and say what you are doing is worthless. But I also agree with @Bones , you are just fooling the local software. And honestly, it will be easy to prove. Go ahead and load your system up with half of your space occupied by duplicates. Let it run for 6 months and see how much you win. The numbers will lay this all to rest. Until you put some real time behind farming it, there is really no discussion to be had. I don’t think anyone else is going to waste resources on it.
There is no command to run to look. The only real way to prove/disprove what you are saying is to let it run and total up the wins. If you end up with more than you should, then there is a discussion.
The video is quite … uh … not there. It says that it is still processing. So you are on your own there.
Well, I thought that was pretty cool in any case. Even if it doesn’t crack the Chia code it did prove something. The crew is right though, testing results with time would be interesting but someone with a big farm would have to volunteer to clone it - too much risk (blockchains have proven over and over that coins can be clawed back if the devs decide to fork).
I think I tried a similar experiment some time ago. I had my main computer farming local plots and additional plots on a NAS. I then added a laptop into the equation as a remote harvester. This also pointed itself to the NAS. The Chia GUI seemed to think there were more plots in the farm and did not report any duplicate plots as the additional plots were from the remote harvester.
However, that’s where the good news stops because the rate I was winning blocks or receiving rewards from SpacePool was the same as before.
I don’t think this situation is like having two tickets with the same number in the raffle and expecting your chances of winning to be doubled.
If this was the case, everybody would be doing it and the whole thing would have collapsed long ago.
It’s like a dozen people sharing the same winning lottery number each thinking they will be paid out the full jackpot. We’ve been telling him this since day one. No proof of anything other than him fooling himself.
That does appear to be a ‘bug’ of sorts. Whatever any remote harvesters sees as its plots should be compared on main node and what it sees as plots, and indicate duplicates are being farmed, not that it matters to winning, but it is an erroneous dashboard reading.
Bruh no you’re not, you’re duplicating your lottery tickets, but you’re not making new ones, therefore your duplicate tickets are worthless.
To be more specific, you’re reading the same plot via numerous harvesters, so even if you have 1 plot and a million harvesters making your 1 plot look like 1 million, this doesn’t increase your odds of winning.
You have 1 million of the same plot, you have 1 million of the same lottery ticket and if the numbers don’t match, you’ve only fooled yourself.
Like I said, good for you, but the blockchain absolutely doesn’t care.
“Simple fractions” bro you can’t even follow simple logic
To put it even more simply if I could, if I read my wallet a million times, or if a million people read my wallet, that doesn’t increase the amount of money I have in my wallet.
