Something new started, different from the typical >
Looking up qualities on U:\plot-k32-2021-09-01-21-59-xxxxx-plot took: 23.095717430114746. This should be below 5 seconds to minimize risk of losing
that I get occasionally (another mysterious problem).
I’m unclear on the difference between “Looking up qualities” and “Block validation time”, beside the fact the “Block validation time” WARNINGS just started appearing. Anyone else seeing these?
If your running chia of a hdd, move to a ssd. ( my advice ). I’m guessing your using ssd, or I think your times would be alot worse.
Upgrade hardware ( keybase support advice ).
To be fair, they didn’t say it was necessary, and the person asking was only getting just over 1 sec.
They did say keep an eye on it, but couldn’t give a figure of x seconds is a problem that needs fixing to stop loss of coin.
I’m seeing this error message on my node, which is a Raspberry Pi 4 4GB. Running CLI only. The blockchain files are on their own SSD, everything else is running from a fast SD card (SanDisk Extreme).
From debug.log, e.g. full_node chia.full_node.full_node: WARNING Block validation time: 2.69 seconds, pre_validation time: 0.71 seconds, cost: 1925053292, percent full: 17.5%
Has anyone found information on what each part of this warning means?
Background is I’m working though the log trying to eliminate or understand problems, because recently my node has become unreliable (stops syncing at regular intervals). Only a reboot of the OS will fix it (along with harvester machines too it seems). The error then isn’t reported immediately after a reboot, so will keep an eye out for it starting again, which I assume will happen. For those on Linux, I use tail and grep to monitor, although I expect there is a better way! For example: tail -f ~/.chia/mainnet/log/debug.log | grep 'Block validation time'
Thanks, is that an operation that would require a but of CPU grunt, which my RaspberryPi 4 might not quite be up to? Hence I get a warning that this activity took longer than expected.
I found this thread too, with similar lines of thinking.