As the title says -
Ryzen 3600
2x 1TB nvme
24GB ram
I also mine with my gpu so need to spare 2 cores threads and 3.4GB ram.
I am currently running following config and feel that its highly inefficient.
As the title says -
Ryzen 3600
2x 1TB nvme
24GB ram
I also mine with my gpu so need to spare 2 cores threads and 3.4GB ram.
I am currently running following config and feel that its highly inefficient.
Looks like the limit is set under global settings, that overrules any settings for the jobs so you have to set that to match the total of the jobs
Edit: actually your elapsed time doesn’t match the other times, so maybe you just need to restart the view in a new window.
for each 1TB you van run:
max 3 plots,
max 3-4 with early start
recommend max 1 in phase 1,
use 6 threads,
set the cpu affinity 4 till 11 for both jobs. (or 4-7 and 8-11)
That time mismatch is due to my pc’s clock being out of sync when I started Swar. Then I corrected it later, so time values are a bit off since then.
I actually meant 2 threads instead of cores. Stupid me writes without thinking.
Any reason why no new plot has started though It has already crossed 2 hour stagger time? Or is it due to time mismatch??
Anything else I need to change? Max_concurrent or sth? Just 1 in Phase 1? For each?
yes I would say the time mismatch is probably the cause.
(or the global settings)
least as possible in phase one (most cpu heavy part), use 4 or 6 threads per plot. you can assign more threads than you have total, it still uses it and goes a bit faster. Only phase 1 uses multi thread anyway, rest is single thread
Thanks for replying. But wouldn’t plotting 4 plots with 2 core each be better than 2 plots with 4 threads each in Phase 1?
Global -
Max_concurrent - 10
Max concurrent in phase 1 - 6
Minimum gap between jobs - 5 minutes