yes, that gives you a starting point for max parallel plots.
it points out that number of threads is the bottleneck for your setup.
phase 1 is multithreaded… you still want 1 thread for each of the other phases as well and maybe one for the OS as well so you can still do other stuff
3 threads for phase 2,3,4 … 1 for OS → 4 taken… 12 left
12 threads for plots in phase 1… each plot can use 4 threads … makes 3 plots in phase 1 the config to try
with 8 plots in parallel total
use a plot manager like SWAR that allows you to set in the config how many plots should be in phase 1, and it will start a new plot once another in progress moves from phase 1 to phase 2
All of the effort being used to squeeze out faster plots implies that people have endless terabytes of storage for their plots.
And due to Chia, the price of storage has gone up in some places, and availability of storage is an issue (unless you are prepared to pay inflated prices or for expensive data center level storage solutions).
My question is:
Why the rush to squeeze out ~5% more plots, if you have no-where left to store your plots?
At 30 to 50 plots per day (and more for people using several plotters), where are they storing all of their plots? Where are they finding the drives? Are they awash with ca$h to buy expensive drives with ease?
I’m in UK, I can buy drives from some suppliers at ridiculous prices, but from others at reasonable prices.
With no space left, no point in faster replotting, this tells us those wanting faster plotting have enough storage left to plot for it to be a concern, or plan to add more storage.
Net space ain’t gonna stop inclining anytime soon is my take on it.