How do I revert back to the original chiapos?
GitHub - madMAx43v3r/chia-plotter
My results = 1 K32 plot in 1990 sec!!
Proofs 416 / 400, 1.04
Plot Name: plot-k32-2021-06-08-22-39-8747d228fe630e529388ee82e25daea5a29f6e5b362126b938c295507611df94
[P1] Table 1 took 24.8096 sec
[P1] Table 2 took 94.9047 sec, found 4295005556 matches
[P1] Lost 38245 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 3 took 150.257 sec, found 4295028207 matches
[P1] Lost 60857 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 4 took 200.829 sec, found 4295013337 matches
[P1] Lost 45380 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 5 took 192.758 sec, found 4295087110 matches
[P1] Lost 120375 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 6 took 171.707 sec, found 4295036538 matches
[P1] Lost 69557 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 7 took 120.433 sec, found 4294961094 matches
Phase 1 took 956.058 sec
[P2] max_table_size = 4295087110
[P2] Table 7 scan took 10.9199 sec
[P2] Table 7 rewrite took 46.4142 sec, dropped 0 entries (0 %)
[P2] Table 6 scan took 28.6829 sec
[P2] Table 6 rewrite took 53.0487 sec, dropped 581337606 entries (13.5351 %)
[P2] Table 5 scan took 26.4871 sec
[P2] Table 5 rewrite took 49.8847 sec, dropped 762038528 entries (17.7421 %)
[P2] Table 4 scan took 28.3256 sec
[P2] Table 4 rewrite took 48.7869 sec, dropped 828877948 entries (19.2986 %)
[P2] Table 3 scan took 25.4886 sec
[P2] Table 3 rewrite took 48.9579 sec, dropped 855106230 entries (19.9092 %)
[P2] Table 2 scan took 24.9134 sec
[P2] Table 2 rewrite took 48.8068 sec, dropped 865575282 entries (20.1531 %)
Phase 2 took 450.005 sec
Wrote plot header with 268 bytes
[P3-1] Table 2 took 47.5261 sec, wrote 3429430274 right entries
[P3-2] Table 2 took 31.5062 sec, wrote 3429430274 left entries, 3429430274 final
[P3-1] Table 3 took 51.2182 sec, wrote 3439921977 right entries
[P3-2] Table 3 took 34.6017 sec, wrote 3439921977 left entries, 3439921977 final
[P3-1] Table 4 took 54.3665 sec, wrote 3466135389 right entries
[P3-2] Table 4 took 32.8395 sec, wrote 3466135389 left entries, 3466135389 final
[P3-1] Table 5 took 52.9282 sec, wrote 3533048582 right entries
[P3-2] Table 5 took 34.0876 sec, wrote 3533048582 left entries, 3533048582 final
[P3-1] Table 6 took 55.1114 sec, wrote 3713698932 right entries
[P3-2] Table 6 took 35.2223 sec, wrote 3713698932 left entries, 3713698932 final
[P3-1] Table 7 took 65.1647 sec, wrote 4294961094 right entries
[P3-2] Table 7 took 51.6132 sec, wrote 4294961094 left entries, 4294961094 final
Phase 3 took 548.402 sec, wrote 21877196248 entries to final plot
[P4] Starting to write C1 and C3 tables
[P4] Finished writing C1 and C3 tables
[P4] Writing C2 table
[P4] Finished writing C2 table
Phase 4 took 35.8864 sec, final plot size is 108835684962 bytes
Total plot creation time was 1990.39 sec
Second plot was faster. I was using the PC during the first plot.
Interesting note: I was getting 43/day using the original peachy combined modified chiapos. If I divide seconds in a day 84,600/1969.03, I getā¦ 43.88
So unless this new plotter lends itself to parallel processes, are we really gaining anything in most use cases?
Plot Name: plot-k32-2021-06-09-00-09-d24436b4bd4f0871b26a68eafb3fa60769a1d3d35f5e506028b34ae34047cdd0
[P1] Table 1 took 12.2591 sec
[P1] Table 2 took 96.7521 sec, found 4294950613 matches
[P1] Table 3 took 154.236 sec, found 4294871360 matches
[P1] Table 4 took 193.88 sec, found 4294970466 matches
[P1] Lost 2857 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 5 took 190.932 sec, found 4294968294 matches
[P1] Lost 745 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 6 took 177.279 sec, found 4294993872 matches
[P1] Lost 26367 matches due to 32-bit overflow.
[P1] Table 7 took 122.585 sec, found 4295042485 matches
Phase 1 took 947.996 sec
[P2] max_table_size = 4295042485
[P2] Table 7 scan took 13.0649 sec
[P2] Table 7 rewrite took 37.295 sec, dropped 0 entries (0 %)
[P2] Table 6 scan took 28.7185 sec
[P2] Table 6 rewrite took 52.859 sec, dropped 581269867 entries (13.5337 %)
[P2] Table 5 scan took 26.8092 sec
[P2] Table 5 rewrite took 50.0234 sec, dropped 761953248 entries (17.7406 %)
[P2] Table 4 scan took 25.6456 sec
[P2] Table 4 rewrite took 49.4492 sec, dropped 828870553 entries (19.2986 %)
[P2] Table 3 scan took 25.3471 sec
[P2] Table 3 rewrite took 49.0754 sec, dropped 855036472 entries (19.9083 %)
[P2] Table 2 scan took 26.2195 sec
[P2] Table 2 rewrite took 48.8021 sec, dropped 865574957 entries (20.1533 %)
Phase 2 took 442.474 sec
Wrote plot header with 268 bytes
[P3-1] Table 2 took 44.9643 sec, wrote 3429375656 right entries
[P3-2] Table 2 took 32.8737 sec, wrote 3429375656 left entries, 3429375656 final
[P3-1] Table 3 took 50.5931 sec, wrote 3439834888 right entries
[P3-2] Table 3 took 33.6685 sec, wrote 3439834888 left entries, 3439834888 final
[P3-1] Table 4 took 51.9865 sec, wrote 3466099913 right entries
[P3-2] Table 4 took 33.1702 sec, wrote 3466099913 left entries, 3466099913 final
[P3-1] Table 5 took 52.1563 sec, wrote 3533015046 right entries
[P3-2] Table 5 took 34.0539 sec, wrote 3533015046 left entries, 3533015046 final
[P3-1] Table 6 took 55.4397 sec, wrote 3713724005 right entries
[P3-2] Table 6 took 34.3975 sec, wrote 3713724005 left entries, 3713724005 final
[P3-1] Table 7 took 62.5906 sec, wrote 4295042485 right entries
[P3-2] Lost 75189 entries due to 32-bit overflow.
[P3-2] Table 7 took 53.3106 sec, wrote 4294967296 left entries, 4294967296 final
Phase 3 took 541.674 sec, wrote 21877016804 entries to final plot
[P4] Starting to write C1 and C3 tables
[P4] Finished writing C1 and C3 tables
[P4] Writing C2 table
[P4] Finished writing C2 table
Phase 4 took 36.839 sec, final plot size is 108834963207 bytes
Total plot creation time was 1969.03 sec
$ plotman analyze $(ls -rt plotter/*log | tail -n 40) ################ # <---- New Hotness
+-------+----+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+
| Slice | n | %usort | phase 1 | phase 2 | phase 3 | phase 4 | total time |
+=======+====+=============+==============+==============+==============+==============+===============+
| x | 33 | Ī¼=100.0 Ļ=0 | Ī¼=7.6K Ļ=160 | Ī¼=6.5K Ļ=147 | Ī¼=5.9K Ļ=168 | Ī¼=610.7 Ļ=21 | Ī¼=20.7K Ļ=332 |
+-------+----+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+
$ plotman analyze $(ls -rt plotter-standard/*log | tail -n 32) ######################### # <---- Stock busted
+-------+----+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------+
| Slice | n | %usort | phase 1 | phase 2 | phase 3 | phase 4 | total time |
+=======+====+=============+==============+==============+==============+===============+==============+
| x | 31 | Ī¼=100.0 Ļ=0 | Ī¼=10.3K Ļ=2K | Ī¼=5.3K Ļ=607 | Ī¼=12.2K Ļ=4K | Ī¼=842.7 Ļ=354 | Ī¼=28.7K Ļ=6K |
+-------+----+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+---------------+--------------+
Lol Iāll quote this weirdo for ya
Which āmodified chiaposā are you referring to? Iām only aware of the one from pechyās combined repo, are there others?
Or
cd chiapos
git checkout 1.0.2
pip install .
Whatās the difference between the āmainā and ācombinedā repo for this?
The combined
branch is similar to main
except for the addition of a faster sort developed by another user (link below). It should perform better than main
.
Thanks for the assist bud!