It took a while, but with your help, I finally put together a plotting PC set.
Dell Optiplex 970 SFF
- CPU i5-2400 3.10 Gzh (Turbo 3.4 Ghz) 4 colors, 4 threads
- RAM 4x 4GB (totaly 16 GB) DDR3 1333 Mhz
- SSD SATA 512GB OR 1 TB, I still don’t know the answer if it would be an advantage to buy 1 TB in my attachment, because it was suggested to me that my PC will probably only handle two processes anyway, so 1 TB is unnecessarily big for me. Sata because my PC can’t m.2 and also for the previous sentence. I wouldn’t use nvme potential with such an old PC.
Question:
- Do you have any guesses about how fast I will be able to plot with this set?
- How do you recommend setting up plotting processes for this report? The PC is reserved for plotting purposes only.
Thank you very much for the information.
I mean this calculation is unusable because there is no CPU as CPU, no RAM as RAM and no SSD as SSD.
There is a difference between a 1.5 Ghz CPU and a 4.4 Ghz CPU.
Likewise between DD3 and DDR4.
Also between SSD SATA and SSD M.2 nvme
I deduced a lot of charlatan that when I use my CPU and my RAM, I need a disk that will be able to write caa. 80 MB / s, so for two parallel processes, a SSA SATA 500 Gb should really suffice. So I don’t need nvme.
Result:
CPU: (4 + 4) / 2 = 4 parallel processes of plotting
RAM: 16000/3400 = 4 parallel processes of plotting
SSD SATA: 480/250 = 2 parallel processing processes
So it’s bad. I can add a second SATA SSD or just one NVME SSD in an external box via USB, but it’s hard to say if the SSD would nvme USB 3.0. Alternatively probably i can put nvme to SATA3 box.