The average %util is 75%, it occasionally spikes to 85%. Here is the full output (note this is just a snapshot and some of the other values vary quite a lot).
I know its not a 59xx but I have a TR Pro 16/32, WRX80 Sage with 64gb ram. I am running windows and have 7 Firecuda 520s 1tb and 2 tb. I have not been able to reach more than 40 plots per day and that is using 6 threads/4gb ram with 24 parallell process spread evenly across the temp drives(my own script that launches a process every 1200s across each drive until done) At 24 I get 52000s per plot but is the most I have been able to get in a 24h period
Firecuda slow. Bursts to 4500mbs then throttles down to 500mbs for extended writes (anything over a minute.) I had Firecudas and turned them in for 970 pros.
Hi parsifal, can you tell me which software did you use to lock the core speed at 4.7ghz at most time like you said last time? I’m currently using linux ubuntu focal atm, but can’t find a software that can actually lock the core speed at that exact number i want. (I also use 5950x)
I tried it without RAID and mounted them w/o discard and set the default trimming of linux to hourly, but still getting IO Waits up to 10% with those Firecudas.
I am not quite sure if i should return them and get some 980/pm9a1 something like this instead. But i am a little worried about TBW and warranty… I still have a lot free HDDs which need to be filled up. Or if i should slap them additional drives in and keep those Firecudas…
I have some pm9a3 in another system and i really like them… but no chance to get one of those atm
Mine are blazingly fast (980 Pro 1TB) and regarding TBW I think you need to be much less concerned then marketing has led you to believe.
Mine are now at 18% life according to the NVMe drives themselves with 301TB written. Extrapolated that points towards ~1700TBW as the real value for these drives (performing a Chia workload only!) and then it’s everyone’s guess how much longer it will actually last.
Firstly if you’re going to the effort of installing Clear Linux (presumably for improved performance) then you should install the Server version to avoid the overheads of the desktop/GUI.
To install Chia CLI it would be something like this:
I also have the AMD 5900X (12c/24t), RAM (64GB), SSD (2TB*2, M.2, RAID0)
Now I’m doing 11 plots in parallel with settings (2 threads, 3390 MiB, 0 delay time) on Windows 10, using Chia CLI programs by opening 11 command line windows to achieve 11 plots parallel.
But comparing to your results, my averaging time is over 12 hours per plot, almost your 2x time.
Hey, Newbie here.
I’ve skimmed this thread but thought Id add my efforts.
I’m running a 5950x and 64gb Ram. 2 x 2tb NVME and 1 x 1tb NVME. 2 threads per plot
the two 2tb NVME’s are max 7 concurrent with a 5min stagger
the 1tb NVME is 3 concurrent with 5 min stagger and for the last 3 days I’ve been getting exactly 40 plots per day. I still have some headroom (not much) but I’m happy to keep at 40.
This rig is also mining ETH with a 3090 at the same time.