It’s worth considering that I run 128gb ram mode, and the performance of the intermediate t1 ssd also plays a big role here.
But yes, in the cuda performance table it have almost the same index.
Can someone advise a simple script to move plots to multiple (2 is enough) destination HDDs (without moving duplicates obviously)?
Disclaimer: I am far from being advanced or even any good in command line.
I use this one below + task manager on Windows 11:
$sourceFolder = “F:\Plots”
$destinationFolder = “E:\Pool1”
Get-ChildItem $sourceFolder -Filter *.plot | Move-Item -Destination $destinationFolder
Get-ChildItem $sourceFolder -Recurse | Where-Object { $.PSIsContainer -and @(Get-ChildItem $.FullName -Force).Count -eq 0 } | Remove-Item -Recurse
Good point, I forgot that bit.
If you want something simple then there is my Plot Mover GUI.
1 Like
Hello @Voodoo:
I upgraded my i9-13900T with 192GB RAM (4x DDR5 48GB), and it works well. Win11 Pro sees all 192GB. Using the BB_CUDA beta, I am able to use the hybrid GPU/disk plot with the --disk-128 switch. In doing so, Windows still shows around 156GB RAM usage (because Chrome isn’t open haha). Would it be possible to make the BB_CUDA use 160GB RAM, leaving 32GB for the OS?
Also, I keep getting “Waiting for parks buffer to become available”. What is that a symptom of?
anyone having finalizing table 7 problem… my ploting just stops on finalizing table 7, tryed on 2 diffrent pc, sometimes after 1 plot sometines after 3 plots… its random…
Latest version now includes automated plot checking and deletion if it does meet the requirements
If it deletes the plot it doesn’t currently plot a replacement, so if you specify 100 plots, and 3 are deleted you will get 97 plots.
./bladebit_cuda -f <key> -c <contractadress> -n 1 --compress 7 cudaplot --check 100 --check-threshold 0.8 /mnt/plotstmp/
--check <n> : Perform a plot check for <n> proofs on the newly created plot.
--check-threshold <f>: Proof threshold rate below which the plots that don't pass
the check will be deleted.
That is, the number of proofs fetched / proof check count
must be above or equal to this threshold to pass.
(default=0.6).
any improvements in plotting speed compared to beta1?
No, same speed.
20chrs
Out of curiosity, does the GH plotter have this same issue of not creating valid plots or plots which don’t pass a certain quality threshold? I replotted with bladebit_cuda instead of GH so a little concerned. Seems strange if a bug is causing issues with plots that it can’t be fixed if GH doesn’t have the same issues.
I have same problem too.
never had issues with GH nor BB 
Its not strange, its very complicated code, and it just means that Chia hasn’t found the cause yet.
I just reinstalled windows 11 pro and Im getting this. I’m using the exact same script as I was before. Anybody have any suggestions to fix this?
You are using a forward slash, where you should be using a backslash.
./bladebit_cuda (is the wrong slash)
.\bladebit_cuda (is the correct slash).
1 Like
Jeez I feel like an idiot. Thank you very much.
I see that your Command Prompt windows allows for additional tabs:
Is that a Windows 11 feature?
Or some 3rd party add-on?
I am running Windows 10 and have never seen that.
Yea windows 11 feature
1 Like
lol finally something interesting in win11
1 Like
If you want extra tabs, just install the Terminal app onto win10 
3 Likes