Your math is bad.
I dont know where you came up with 192TB as you were talking about renting 168TB for 560/mth. Even if you do get 192TB for 560/mth. your cost of rental for 9600TB would be $28,000/mth plus tax.
9600TB = 8700Tib. If you could magically fill this space with valid plots instantly (which you cannot), the advanced calculator says:
Estimated Total Earnings
XCH after 1 year
233.8551
USD after 1 year
$154.34k
28,000/mth rent x 12 = $336,000.
Your estimated income for the first year is $154,000. Your fixed expenses for that same year are $336,000 before you have paid to lay down a single plot. Over a year you will spend more than twice as much as you earn.
Scaling the rental to plot production will reduce your loss, but now you need to work the numbers for how much plot production is going to cost and how fast your plot production is. Now add that to your expenses. I have worked the numbers. Loss grows when you include plot production expenses, even if you scale the rental.
You cannot convince me that spending more than twice as much as you earn is anything but crazy, let alone a good business model.
If you had your 9600TB filled already and farmed it starting now you would turn a small profit for two months before the total Chia network space growth and your rental costs turned you into a net loser. So you would be correct and make maybe $20,000 profit. But, you have not taken into account plotting cost or time. 9600TB will hold over 9000 K32s. At $2/plot, there goes your āprofitā. With your unattainable starting goal, your strategy does not work because you cannot insta-fill your space with plots for free. Even if you could, you would still be lucky to turn any profit for the first two months and after that you would become a sure loser again.
I suspect you are using the basic Chia calculator and not converting TB to TIB. Your earnings projections are way out of whack. Always use the advanced Chia calculator. Even the numbers it returns are based on some brave assumptions.
Iāll end where I started.
Your math is bad.